For accounting & CAS firms

From delivering reports to delivering decisions.

You have already changed what you sell. CentSight reviews every client’s books on a schedule and answers what comes next — so what lands with the client reads like guidance rather than a package.

Book reviewHW E-Commerce
Monthly · run 1 Jul
  • Timing

    Annual renewal expensed in one month

    $4,495 bill · $375 belongs to June

    $4,120
  • Duplicate

    Supplier invoice entered from the feed and by hand

    Jun 14 · bank feed + manual

    2 entries
  • Vendor

    New vendor billing above this client's usual range

    Jun 22 · first invoice

    1 vendor
  • Anomaly

    Software spend outside the client's own pattern

    Jun · against 12 months of history

    3 entries

4 findings · each one opens the entries behind it

The advisory gap

You changed what you sell. The delivery rhythm didn't change with it.

The engagement letter says advisory. The month still ends the way it always did — a close, then a package — which is why the conversation about fees keeps coming back.

What the fee is for

  • Judgement on what the numbers mean for the business
  • Answers between the cycles, not only at the end of one
  • A partner who already knows where this client is exposed

What the month produces

  • A close, then a package, on the same calendar as before
  • Review work done by hand, against the same deadline every month
  • Questions picked up afterwards, once there is room left in the week

Nothing in the second column is a performance problem. It is what a compliance rhythm produces, and it is the specific thing CentSight is meant to change.

Scheduled book review

The review a junior does by hand, run against every client on a schedule.

CentSight runs a full review of a client’s connected books on the cadence you set. It reads every transaction in the period rather than a sample, and comes back with a list of what looks wrong and the entries sitting behind each finding.

It flags anomalies, miscategorised transactions, duplicate charges and unusual vendor activity — the same sweep a staff accountant makes before a package goes out, done before anyone opens the file.

Your team still decides what is a real error and what is just an unusual month. What changes is that the reading has already been done, on every client, not only the ones there was time for.

Review schedule5 client workspaces
  • HW E-Commerce

    Monthly · last run 1 Jul

    4 findings
  • Marketing Agency

    Monthly · last run 1 Jul

    1 finding
  • Pulse HQ

    Weekly · last run 28 Jun

    2 findings
  • Restaurant Group

    Monthly · last run 1 Jul

    No findings
  • Coastal Property Group

    Weekly · last run 28 Jun

    3 findings

What it catches

Four kinds of finding, with the entries attached.

Every finding names the transactions it came from, so the first thing your team does with it is check it rather than take it on faith.

Miscategorised transactions

Fees booked into deposits, owner draws sitting in expenses, a new vendor landing in the wrong account. The kind of thing that makes margin read wrong without making the statement look broken.

Duplicate charges

The same invoice entered twice, a subscription billed on two cards, a payment recorded from the bank feed and again by hand.

Unusual vendor activity

A vendor that has never billed above a certain level suddenly does, or one that bills every month quietly stops.

Anomalies against the client's own history

Movement judged against how this client's books normally behave, rather than a generic rule that flags every seasonal business every quarter.

After the package goes out

The client's question, answered on the day they ask it.

The findings explain what happened. The client still wants to know what it means — usually a week after the package landed, and usually in a question nobody can answer without opening the file again.

Anyone on the team can ask in plain English and get a figure computed against that client’s ledger, with the transactions behind it attached. Rephrasing the question doesn’t move the number, because the number was computed rather than written.

That is the difference between sending a report and having a conversation — which is the part the advisory fee was for.

HW E-CommerceSynced

Why did net income drop last month?

Net income fell $4,120 against last month, but the business didn’t get worse. An annual software renewal was expensed in full in June; only one month of it belongs there.

Annual software renewal
$4,495
Belongs to June
$375
Prepaid, expensed early
$4,120
Net margin, corrected
8.1% → 11.4%

Source: 1 bill entry · Jun 4 · QuickBooks Online

The rest of the analyst

The book review is one capability. The analyst's five parts sit beside it.

Everything here runs on the same read-only connection to the same client books. The product page covers each part properly rather than repeating it on every page.

Chat
Ask about any client in plain English; the figure comes back with its entries attached.
Signals
Continuous monitoring in between the scheduled reviews.
Widgets
Live cash, revenue, margin and spend views, arranged per client.
Financial model
First-draft projections and scenarios built off the client's own actuals.
Knowledge
What makes each client's business behave the way it does, held per workspace.

Kept apart

Every client sealed off from every other.

A review on one client cannot read another one's books. Each company is its own workspace with its own connections and its own history, so separation is structural rather than something your team maintains by hand.

Your firm

HW E-Commerce

Connected to QuickBooks, Chase, Stripe

Marketing Agency

Connected to QuickBooks, BofA, HubSpot

Pulse HQ

Connected to QuickBooks, Mercury, Stripe

Restaurant Group

Connected to QuickBooks, Wells Fargo, Slack

Separate data, separate history, separate connections. Nothing crosses between columns.

How firms adopt it

Internal first. Client-facing when you decide.

Most of this starts inside the firm and stays there for a while. For a CAS practice the third rung is the one with money attached — a scoped workspace inside the retainer, sold as an add-on, or under your own brand — but it is a decision you make later, not a condition of starting.

  1. 01

    Where every firm starts

    Internal only

    Advisors use CentSight as their own tool — asking, reviewing, and deciding what's ready before anything reaches a client.

  2. 02

    Once it has earned it

    Read-only client access

    Clients see the work an advisor creates in the tool — reports, analysis, answers — without touching it directly themselves.

  3. 03

    If and when you want it

    Full client access

    Clients get their own access: a 24/7 financial analyst working for them, inside the workspace your firm still controls.

The firm decides which rung it is on, and when that changes. Nothing moves to a client without you putting it there.

Common questions

What CAS firms ask first.

Does the book review change anything in the client's books?

No. The connection is read-only and stays that way. A review produces a list of findings with the entries behind each one; the corrections are made by your team, in the client's file, the way they always have been.

How often does it run?

You set the cadence per client, so a review can sit before close, after close, or both. A client you have just taken on can run weekly while you clean up the history, then drop back to monthly.

Do we have to change how we run close?

No. It reads the books you already keep, in whatever state they are in on the day it runs. Nothing about your close checklist, your workpapers or your software has to move for it to be useful.

Does this replace the review a junior does?

It does the sweep — reading every transaction in the period and pulling out what looks wrong. What it does not do is decide which findings are real errors, correct them, or explain them to a client. That judgement stays with the person who signs the work.

What if a client's books are genuinely messy?

That is the case it is most useful in. It reads the whole period rather than a sample, so a messy file produces a longer list of findings, not a worse one. What your team does with that list is a scoping conversation, not a software problem.

Bring the client whose books you dread.

We’ll connect a real set of books, run a review, and walk through what it found with you — including the things you already knew were in there.

Running a fractional CFO or advisory practice? That pitch is on its own page.